LENTlC WETLAND lNVENTORY SEARCH

ESG Admin. Head Search Form


08/28/2008 22:54:50

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
Record ID Number:

A1. Field data collected by:

A2. Funding Agency/Organization:

A3a. BLM State Office:

A3b. BLM Field Office/Field Station:

A3c. BLM Office Code:

A3d. Is the polygon in an active BLM grazing allotment? (Yes; No; NA):

If Yes, A3e (Allotment Information #1): A3f (Allotment Information #2):
Allotment Number:
Allotment Number:
Allotment ID:
Allotment ID:
Allotment Name:
Allotment Name:
Management Status:
Management Status:

A9. Year: A10. Date field data collected:

A11. Observers:

A12a. At least some part of this polygon has been inventoried more than once (resampled)? (Yes; No):

If No, go to item A13a. If Yes, A12b. This polygon coincides exactly with another inventoried polygon? (Yes; No):

A12c. Is this the latest inventory for this polygon? (Yes; No):

A12d. ID number(s) of other inventories of this polygon: , , , ,

A12e. Other years: 12f. This polygon shares common area with other inventoried polygon(s)? (Yes; No):

A12g. Other years:

A12h. ID number(s) of other records sharing area with this polygon: , , ,

A13a. Has a change in management occurred? (Yes; No):

If Yes, A13b. Year that changed occurred:

A13c. Type of management change applied:

 

LOCATION DATA

B1. State: B2. County:

B3. Allotment/Range unit:

B4a. Area name:

B4b. Tributary to:

B4c. Group name: B4d. Group number:

B5. Polygon Number:

B6. Location: 1/4 1/4 Section: 1/4 Section:

Section: Township (NS): Range (EW):

B7. Elevation (ft): (m):

B8a. Hydrologic unit code (HUC): B8b. Sub-basin name (4th level HUC):

B8c. Sub-basin area (sq mi): (sq m): B8d. Sub-basin area (ac): (hect):

B8e. Sub-basin perimeter (mi): (m):

  Deg Min Sec N/S  
Deg Min Sec E/W  
Upper End:
Lat:
 
Long:
 
Lower End:
Lat:
 
Long:
 
Other Point:
Lat:  
Long:
 

 

 

 

 

B9b. UTM coordinates of polygon UPPER END: Easting: Northing: Zone: Map Datum:

B9c. UTM coordinates of polygon LOWER END: Easting: Northing: Zone:

B9d. UTM coordinates of any other point of interest in the polygon: East: North: Zone:

B9e. GPS Unit number: WPt Upper: WPt Lower: WPt Other:

B9f. Comments:

B10. Quad map(s): ;

SELECTED SUMMARY DATA

C1. Wetland type:

C2. Polygon size (ac): ; (hect):

C3a. Is the entire polygon an upland: (Yes; No):

If No, C3b. Does the polygon consist entirely of functional wetland types? (Yes; No):

C3c. Functional wetland area (ac): ; (hect):

C3d. Percent of total polygon:

C4. Does the polygon contain a defined shoreline? (Yes; No):

C5. Polygon length (mi): ; (km):

C6. Number of miles the polygon represents (mi): ; (km):

C7a. Average polygon wetland width (ft): ; (m):

C7b. Polygon wetland width range (ft): to ; (m): to

 

PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION (HEALTH) ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

C8. Polygon Proper Functioning Condition (Health) Assessment

Rating Percent
Descriptive Category
Vegetation:
Soil/Hydrology:
Overall:

Rating Percent Range
Descriptive Category
80 - 100
Proper Functioning Condition (Healthy)
60 - 79
Functional At Risk (Healthy, but with Problems)
<60
Nonfunctional (Unhealthy)

 

VEGETATlON DATA

D1a. Wetland prevalence index:

D1b. Vegetation structural diversity:

 

Trees

D2a. Are trees present? (Yes; No):

D2b. Tree species by canopy cover class (%) and percent age group (%)

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

SPECIES

 

Shrubs

D6a. Are shrubs present? (Yes; No):

D6b. Shrub species canopy cover(%), age/size groups, and utilization

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

SPEClES

 

Graminoids

D7. Graminoids present? (Yes No):

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

SPEClES

 

Forbs

D8. Forbs present? (Yes; No):

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

SPEClES

 

 

D9. Plant Group by Canopy Cover (%)

Layer
Trees
Shrubs
Graminoids
Forbs
3 (>6.0 ft):
2 (>1.5 - 6.0 ft):
1 (0 - 1.5 ft):

 

D10. Total canopy cover (%) by lifeform:

Trees:
Shrubs:
Graminoids:
Forbs:

D11. Total canopy cover (%) by woody species:

D12. Total canopy cover (%) by all plant lifeforms:

 

Weed Data

D13a. Are invasive weeds present? (Yes; No; NC):

If Yes, D13b. Enter the canopy cover and the density/distribution class for each of the following invasive species:

Species
Infestation
(Old Method)
Canopy Cover
(New Method)
 

Density/Distribution
Class

Canada Thistle:
 
Common Hound's-tongue:
 
Common Tansy:
 
Dalmatian Toadflax:
 
Diffuse Knapweed:
 
Dyer's woad:
 
Field Scabious
 
Leafy Spurge:
 
Purple Loosestrife:
 
Russian Knapweed:
 
Russian Olive:
 
Saltcedar (Tamarisk):
 
Scotch Thistle:
 
Spotted Knapweed:
 
St. John's Wort:
 
Sulphur Cinquefoil:
 
Whitetop:
 
Others:
 
Others:
 
Others:
 
Others:
 
Others:
 
Others:
 

 
Coverage
Density/Distribution
 
Infestation
(Old Method)
Canopy Cover
(New Method)
(Class)
D13c. Cumulative totals for all invasive species:

D14a. Are undesirable herbaceous species present? (Yes; No; NC): (Not collected prior to 1991)

If Yes. D14b. Record the combined canopy cover (%) of all undesirable herbaceous species observed:

 

D15. Habitat Types and Community Types

Classification Type Name
Phase
Percent of Polygon
Successional State or Comments

D16. Polygon trend: Improving, Degrading, Static, or Status Unknown?

D17. Explain trend description and give other vegetation comments:

 

WATER QUALlTY DATA

E1. Waterbody number:

E2a. Is the waterbody a 303(d) listed impaired stream? (Yes; No)

If Yes, E2b. Year of listing?

E3. Waterbody TMDL priority:

E4. TMDL development status:

E5. Probable cause(s):

E6. Probable impaired uses:

E7. Probable source(s):

 

PHYSlCAL SlTE DATA

F1. Estimate the polygon breakdown into these NWI classes:

Emergent: Scrub/shrub: Forested:

F2. What is the primary water source on the polygon? (Perennial stream, Overland surface flow, Springs/seeps, Topographic contact with groundwater table, Unknown, Other):

Explain Other:

F3. Is the water body in a closed basin with no outlet? (Yes; No; NA; NC)

F4. Describe the water chemistry (Alkaline/Saline; Fresh; Unknown; NC):

F5. Degree of artificial drawdown (Not Subjected; Minor; Moderate; Extreme, NC):

F6a. Is there an overflow strructure? (Yes; No; NA; NC)

If Yes, F6b. Indicate type (Concrete; Pipe; Rock armored; Unprotected; Other): Explain Other:

F6c. Does the overflow structure appear stable? (Yes; No; NA; NC) Explain:

F7a.Does the polygon contain a defined shoreline? (Yes; No; NC)

If F7a = Yes, F7b. Are shore materials visible? (Yes; No; NC) :

If F7b = Yes, F7c. Give the percent of each size (must approx. 100%):

>20 inches (Medium Boulders +)

0.6 - 2.5 inches (Coarse Gravel)
10 - 20 inches (Small Boulders)
0.08 inches - 0.6 inches (Fine Gravel)
5 - 10 inches (Large Cobbles)
0.062 mm - 2 mm (Sand)
2.5 - 5 inches (Small Cobbles)
<0.062 mm (Silt and Clay)

F8. Percent of the shoreline with deep, binding root mass (0-35%; 36-65%; 66-85%; over 85%; NC):

F9a. What percent of the polygon vegetation has been altered by human activities?

F9b. Breakdown the causes of human-caused alteration to the polygon vegetation (must approx. 100%):

Grazing
Timber harvest
Construction
Roads & RRs
Other
Cultivation
Mining activities
Cottage devel.
Recreation
Explain "other":

F9c. Breakdown the kinds of human-caused alteration to the polygon vegetation (must approx. 100%):

Clearing
Replace Deep to Shallow Rooted
Replace Tall to Short
Removal of Structural Layers
Replace Native to Tame Species
Other Kinds
Invasion of Weedy Species
Replace Woody to Herbaceous
   
Explain "other":

F9d . Comment on the nature and extent of human-caused alteration to the vegetation:

F10a. Percent of the polygon has been physically altered by human activities (aside from the vegetation)?

F10b. Breakdown the causes of human-caused alteration to the physical polygon site (must approx. 100%):

Grazing
Construction
Water Management
Timber Harvest
Recreation
Cultivation
Roads & RR
Cottage devel.
Mining activities
Other
Explain "other":

F10c. Breakdown the kinds of human-caused alteration to the physical polygon site (must approx. 100%):

Animal Trampling (hum-pug, trails, paths, wallows, etc)
Shore alteration (hoof shear, riprap, berms, etc.)
   
Human Impervious surface (pavement, roofs, walks, etc.)
Landscaping (altering topography)
   
Hydrologic change (ditching, draining, flooding, berms, etc.)
Plowing/tilling
Other
Explain "other":

F10d . Comment on any odd or unusual aspect of human-caused alteration to the physical polygon:

F11a. Is there exposed soil surface (bare ground)? (Yes; No; NC): If No or NC, go to item F12.

F11b. Percent (%) of the polygon which is exposed soil surface (bare ground):

F11c. Of this, how much is due to Natural Processes: Human-caused disturbance: (must approx.100%)

F11d. Within each category (natural and human-caused), how much resulted from the listed processes?

NATURAL PROCESSES (must approx. 100%) HUMAN-CAUSED PROCESSES (must approx. 100%)
Erosional
Type Dependent
Grazing
Construction
Depositional
Saline/Alkaline
Logging
Mine tailings
Wildlife Use
Within Veg. Channel Bottoms
Recreation
Other
Other Explain"Other":

 

F12. Non-vegetated ground cover. (Note: Bare ground and vascular plant cover recorded above.)

Rocks (>2.5 in.):
Moss:
Litter and duff:
Wood:

F13a. Animal-caused pugging and/or hummocks present? (Yes; No; NC):

If Yes, F13b. Percent (%) of polygon affected:

F14a. Are side drainages and hillslopes contributing to degradation of the system? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

If Yes, F14b. Human-caused? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

Causes:

F14c. Natural cause? (Yes; No; NA; NC): List major soil type:

F15. Water quality is sufficient to support wetland plants? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F16. Lentic wetland zone is enlarging or has reached potential extent? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F17. Lentic wetland area is saturated, or ground water is near or above the surface? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F18. Wetland plants exhibit high vigor? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F19. Frost or abnormal hydrologic heaving is evident? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F20. Favorable microsite conditions (i.e., woody debris, water temp., etc.) maintained by nearby site characteristics? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F21. Chemicals affecting plant productivity/composition not apparently accumulating on the site? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F22. Saturation (ponding frequency and duration of inundation) is sufficient to form and maintain hydric soils? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F23. Underlying geolocic structure (i.e., soil, parent material, permafrost) capable of restricting percolation? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F24. The wetland is in balance with water and sediment supply (no excessive erosion or deposition)? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F25. Islands and shore protected adequately from wind and wave energies by rock and/or large woody debris? (Yes; No; NA; NC):

F26. Comments (Summarize unique characteristics or problems not evident from the data collected. Include topics related to any of the optional data. Consider current and historic attributes resulting from human-caused and natural processes.):

F27. Detailed description of the polygon boundaries if it does not include the entire wetland area at the site:

PHOTOGRAPH DATA

G1a. Identification of photos taken at the north end of polygon: Roll Number: Photographer:

Photo numbers: (northerly/westerly): (southerly/easterly): (others):

G1b. Location of all photos:

Glc. Description of views (northerly/westerly):

(southerly/easterly):

(others):

G2a. Is there an adjacent polygon northerly/westerly of this polygon? (Yes; No):

G2b. Is there an adjacent polygon southerly/easterly of this polygon? (Yes; No):

G3a. Identification of photos (taken at south or east end of polygon): Roll Number: Photographer:

Photo numbers: (northerly/westerly): (southerly/easterly): (others):

G3b. Location of all photos:

G3c. Description of views (northerly/westerly):

(southerly/easterly):

(others):

G4. Film and Camera Specifications

Film brand: Film speed (ASA): Lens diameter (mm):

Lens focal length (mm):

 

OPTIONAL DATA

H1. Vegetative use by animals (0-25%; 26-50%; 51-75%; 76-100%):

H2. Adjacent uplands (Agriculture; Grassland; Shrubland; Forest; or Other):

H3a. Were Category 2 (threatened and endangered) plant species observed? (Yes; No):

If Yes, H3b. Species:

H3c. Location(s):

H4. Percent of shoreline accessible to livestock:

H5a. Has the shoreline configuration been modified by construction? (Yes; No; NC):

If Yes, H5b. How much of the shoreline length is modified (%)?

H5c. What part resulted from the various sources: (must approx.100%)

Dikes:
Road Construction:
Railroads:
Berms:
Water Diversion Structures:
Mining:
Dams:
Vegetation Removal:
Bridges:
Rip-rap:
Channelization:
Logging:
Other:
Explain "Other":